Search for: "James B. Hobbs" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm by Ben Allen
 A federal grand jury subsequently indicted Marsh for seven offenses, including conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Landis: A Life on Fire (Hart Publishing).New Books adds an interview with Marc Simon Rodriguez, who discusses his new book, Rethinking the Chicano Movement (Routledge).H-Net has a review of Tameka B. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from James Gottry in an op-ed at The Hill and from Jay Hobbs at The Federalist. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 4:43 pm
The text we read was, I believe, from his Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad Bhāṣya. Śaṅkara was trying to illuminate the meaning of the root text in light of his Advaitavāda. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
For this proposition, reliance was placed on a first instance decision, Mitchell & Hobbs v Mill [1966] 2 BCLC 102, where Mr Machin QC had held that an individual director, as a general rule, lacks the power to commence proceedings in the name of the company. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, James Conde weighs in on PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
§ 16(b), as incorporated into Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 12:26 pm by Steve Kalar
Throw in due process challenges to statutes like 18 USC § 3142(f)(1)(A) (Bail Reform Act), the Hobbes Act, Section 924(c)offenses, and ACCA, and much welcome mischief awaits. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At the Yale Journal on Regulation’s Notice & Comment blog, James Conde explains “two ways in which the Supreme Court could avoid the constitutional concerns posed by the Fourth Circuit’s decision” in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm by Aurora Barnes
§ 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague; (2) whether Hobbs Act robbery is a “crime of violence” as defined by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6262, James v. [read post]